Calculator

Annual incentive plan calculator

This annual incentive plan calculator is for AIP or STI structures where payout depends on weighted company, team, and individual performance. It is a better fit than a simple bonus calculator when the plan is scorecard-based rather than purely tied to quota.

$15,375
Estimated AIP payout
Weighted achievement: 102.5%

Use this when

  • Your annual incentive plan uses company and individual scorecards.
  • You see terms like STI, AIP, funding factor, modifier, or weighting.
  • You need a cleaner estimate than “salary × target %”.
Related pages

How AIP and STI payouts usually work

Annual incentive plans often blend more than one score. A common structure is 50% company performance and 50% individual performance, but some employers use three layers: company, business unit, and individual.

Payout = target bonus × weighted achievement
Plan featureWhat it changesWhat to check
Company multiplierRaises or lowers the total funding poolCan override strong individual performance.
Weighting splitControls influence of each metricNot all 100% performances matter equally.
ModifierAdds a final up/down adjustmentMay depend on compliance, budget, or leadership discretion.

FAQ

Is AIP the same as STI?

Often yes in practice, although companies use different labels. Both usually refer to short-term annual incentive structures.

Why is my payout lower than my personal rating suggests?

Because many annual incentive plans include company funding or team score effects that pull the payout down.

Can AIP exceed target?

Yes. Some plans allow over-target payouts when company or individual performance beats plan.

How to pressure-test an annual incentive plan

1
Check whether the weights sum to 100%.
If they do not, the estimate may look clean but the plan setup is wrong.
2
Check each metric’s performance level separately.
Strong individual performance can still be dragged down by weak company funding.
3
Ask whether there is a modifier or discretionary overlay.
Some plans apply a final up-or-down adjustment after the weighted score is calculated.
Good plan signal

Weights and metrics are explicit, funding logic is transparent, and the target bonus is easy to translate into payout.

Bad plan signal

Heavy discretionary language, vague modifiers, and unclear score definitions make the target bonus less meaningful.

Why annual incentive plans confuse people

Most AIP plans are not one clean multiplier. They often combine weighted scorecards, company funding, individual achievement, threshold logic, and sometimes executive discretion.

LayerExampleWhy it matters
Target bonus15% of salarySets the maximum reference point for target performance.
Weighted metrics50% company, 30% team, 20% individualPrevents any one number from telling the full story.
Funding / modifier90% company fundingCan reduce payout even when personal results were good.
Cap150% of target payoutLimits upside.
Bad reading

“My target bonus is 15%, so I should get 15% if I performed well.”

Better reading

“The 15% target only matters after I understand weights, score definitions, modifiers, and payout caps.”

Common AIP mistakes

1
Assuming all metrics are equally important.
Weighted plans make some inputs matter far more than others.
2
Ignoring company funding factors.
These can reduce payout after your individual math is already done.
3
Skipping threshold gates.
A missed company floor can shrink or cancel payouts even if team performance was solid.

AIP / STI FAQ

What is an annual incentive plan?

An annual incentive plan is a yearly bonus structure based on a set of company, team, and individual performance measures.

Is AIP the same as STI?

Often close enough for practical use. STI means short-term incentive, while AIP is a common name for the annual version of that incentive structure.

Why does my payout differ from my target bonus?

Because weighted metrics, company funding, and caps can move the final number away from the target bonus headline.